The role

The closest job titleis chief of staff.

Not an assistant that waits to be asked and not a tool you operate. Something that holds the whole picture, does the work without being walked through it, keeps the promises you made in a meeting you have half forgotten, and tells you when you are about to make a mistake. This page is where that analogy is accurate and where it stops being.

It holds the whole picture It works while you are elsewhere It will disagree with you
What the job actually is

A chief of staff is defined by what you never have to say.

The value is not in doing tasks. It is in not needing the brief, because somebody already knows what happened, who is waiting, what was promised and what it was for.

01

It holds the context

Every conversation, every person you have mentioned, every decision and the reason behind it. You do not brief it, because it was there. That is the whole difference between an assistant and someone who has been with you a year.

02

It keeps the thread

The thing you said you would follow up on gets followed up on. It wakes on a schedule, returns to what was left open, and is further along in the morning than where you left it.

03

It comes back with the thing

Not a plan for the thing and not a summary of how one might approach it. The finished document, the working code, the shipped change, with what it found and what it decided along the way.

04

It tells you the truth

If something you are about to send will land badly, you hear that before you send it. Anything that only ever agrees with you is flattering you, and flattery has never helped anybody.

The half people forget

Most of the job happens between other people.

A chief of staff is not principally your interface to a computer. They are in the room where the work is being decided, which is why Maison is in the room too.

In the room

A project gets a room, and it is in it

The people you invite are there and so is Maison, following what is being decided, keeping the brief and the to do list current without anybody maintaining them, and building what gets asked for.

How team rooms work

And out of it

It knows when to stay quiet

Most messages in a room are people talking to each other, and it leaves those alone. It speaks when it can add something, and it reaches a teammate by mail or a notification when something genuinely needs them.

How it handles mail

Where the analogy breaks

It is not a person, and we are not going to write as if it were.

The comparison is useful for saying what shape the thing is. Taken literally it would be a lie, and a lie you would find out about in the first week.

It does not

Have standing in a room of humans

  • It cannot sit in a meeting on your behalf and be treated as you
  • It has no read on the politics that never got written down anywhere
  • It does not carry your relationships, it carries what was said in them
  • It will not decide something with consequences without coming back to you
What it is

The part of that job a machine can genuinely hold

  • The memory, which no person has at this resolution
  • The follow through, at three in the morning, without resenting it
  • The doing, in parallel, across as many threads as the work needs
  • The honesty, because it has nothing to gain by managing you

What it runs under is published in full rather than kept proprietary, which is the only reason any of that last line is checkable. The constitution.

The comparison you are actually making

Against a salary, the arithmetic is not close.

We would rather you did that sum yourself than have us do it for you, so here are the real numbers and nothing around them.

$799 a month

One machine that belongs to you, everything on this site, your memory on your own disk, and a person from here for as long as the setup takes.

$250 a person

For each colleague you bring onto it, up to four besides you, however they use it. More than that is a company, and there is a tier for it.

Plus your Claude account

Billed to you directly by Anthropic at whatever their rate is. We take no part of it and we do not mark it up.

The whole cost, added up

It is early, and the price says so. It is also not for everybody, and the honest test is whether re explaining your situation costs you more than the answers save. If it does not, keep what you have.

Questions

Questions about the role.

What is an AI chief of staff?

Something that holds the whole picture rather than waiting for instructions. It knows what was decided and why, keeps the promises you made in a meeting you have half forgotten, comes back with finished work rather than a plan for it, and tells you when you are about to make a mistake.

Can this replace an executive assistant?

It replaces a particular part of that job, which is the part a machine can genuinely hold: the memory at a resolution no person has, the follow through at three in the morning, and the doing across as many threads as the work needs. It is not a person and we will not write as if it were.

What can a human in that role do that this cannot?

Sit in a meeting on your behalf and be treated as you. Read the politics that never got written down. Carry your relationships rather than what was said in them. Those are real and they are not coming, so it is better to say it now.

Does it work with my team or only with me?

Both. Every project gets a room, the people you invite are in it and so is Maison, keeping the brief and the to do list current without anybody maintaining them. It stays out of the conversations that are people talking to each other.

How does the cost compare to hiring someone?

$799 a month for the machine, $250 for each colleague you add up to four, and your own Claude account billed directly by Anthropic. We would rather you did that arithmetic against a salary yourself than have us do it for you.

Hand it the thing you keep putting off.

That is the test. Tell us what it is, and we will show you the same one we use every day.